03/04/2026
I’ll be honest - I went through a “filter phase” (and any photographer who said they didn’t is lying!)
And when I look back at those photos now, I cringe. Not because the images were bad, but because they could have been anyone’s. Shot anywhere, at any wedding, by anyone with a preset and a Lightroom subscription.
Here’s the thing people don’t think about. You didn’t accidentally end up with those colours. You spent months choosing the exact shade of your florals, your dresses, your linens. Every colour on your wedding day was a deliberate decision - and a filter changes all of it.
This goes double for Indian weddings, where the colour isn’t just decoration, it’s the story. The red of a lehenga, the gold catching the light, the marigolds. Washing that out isn’t an aesthetic choice - it’s a loss.
And then there’s the longer view. The dark and moody presets, the desaturated, flat colours - they all had their moment, and then they dated badly.
Your photos aren’t content. They’re your legacy. That deserves editing that tells the truth about your day, not editing that was trendy the year you got married.
So when I photograph your wedding, you can rest assured that all the colours in your photos will match what your eyes actually saw.
What do you think - do you think filters add to or take away from photos?